Published Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at: 7:00 AM EST
Vincent and Norma Riccardi both turned age 50 this year, and their midlife crisis has nothing to do with longing for a return of their salad days. Rather, they’re looking ahead—and they’re worried they haven’t saved enough for retirement.
It’s not that they’ve been financially irresponsible. They both earn a decent living, together making $200,000 a year, and they have faithfully contributed to college savings plans that will pay for their children’s higher education. They just haven’t been able to set aside as much for the future as they would have liked. In other words, they’re in the same boat as many other people their age.
Vincent and Norma have $100,000 in savings in a taxable account, and another $200,000 in tax-deferred retirement plans. They hope to retire at age 65 (15 years from now). According to the online calculator of Money magazine, the couple would have to sock away $75,800 annually from now until retirement to be able to count on 80% of their current yearly income after they stop working, a typical goal for retirees. That’s an annual savings rate of 37.9%—a highly unlikely proposition.
But there are a few ways the Riccardis can improve on that situation. If they continue to do most of their saving in tax-deferred accounts, such as 401(k) plans and IRAs, their money will go further, and their future Social Security benefits will also reduce the amount they have to save. For 2016, 401(k) participants can direct up to $18,000 of salary into their accounts ($24,000 for people over 50), and they can put an additional $5,500 ($6,500 for people over 50) in an IRA (though at the Riccardis’ income level, their IRA contributions won’t be deductible).
For simplicity’s sake, assume that Vincent and Norma remain in a 28% federal income tax bracket and a 6% state income tax bracket for the next 15 years without any other tax complications. They’ve already saved $300,000 in their various accounts, and if together they contribute another $20,000 a year to their 401(k) plans until age 65, and they earn a hypothetical 5% rate annually on all of their investments, they will accumulate a total of $1.53 million (inflation-adjusted to $968,000 based on an annual 3% inflation rate).
Note that the Money calculator assumes investors will turn over 20% of the holdings in taxable accounts every year, generating long- and short-term taxes. It explains that retirement goals will be reached faster if investors trade less and hold tax-efficient mutual funds.
In this case, the Riccardis ought to be able to do better than a $1.53 million nest egg. Suppose they manage to double their annual 401(k) and IRA contributions to $40,000 a year. Assuming that same 5% annual interest rate on all investments, after 15 years, the Riccardis will have amassed $1.96 million (inflation-adjusted to $1.24 million), enabling them to enjoy a more comfortable retirement.
Of course, the returns cited here are for illustrative purposes only and are not indicative of any particular investment or strategy. Any investment includes inherent risks and there is no absolute protection against loss of principal in a declining market.
When it comes to your personal situation, there may be several ways to improve the odds of retiring comfortably.
You could make increase regular contributions and “catch-up contributions” to your retirement plans. These are allowed for those who are age 50 or over. For 2016, they can defer an additional $6,000 for their 401(k), while IRA owners can kick in $1,000 more than the normal $5,500 limit. These figures are indexed annually for inflation and should continue to rise.
Revisit your investment mix. There’s a tradeoff between risk and reward, and your portfolio should balance your need to preserve your savings with the possibility of reaching goals more quickly by adding investments that might achieve higher returns. Of course, this is generally not recommended if retirement is imminent.
Consider working a little longer. For example, the Riccardis can’t receive their full Social Security benefits until age 67, and staying on the job those two extra years will allow them to save more; at the same time it reduces the number of years during which they’ll have to depend on retirement income. Even such a relatively small shift can make a major difference in retirement prospects. More importantly, their Social Security benefits would not be reduced for life.
Everyone’s situation is different, and coming up with a retirement plan that works for you may involve considering several alternative scenarios and mixing and matching a combination of factors—your saving rate, your investment strategy, your retirement needs, when you’ll leave the work force—to come up with a plan that works for you. We can provide expert guidance.
This article was written by a professional financial journalist for Advisor Products and is not intended as legal or investment advice.